
Erik Adigard. Absolut Adigard. 1996. Courtesy of Absolut Vodka.
In mijn gesprekken met grafisch ontwerpers gaat het opvallend vaak over archiveren en tegenwoordig vooral over 'digitaal bewaren'. Het valt me telkens op hoe verschillend er wordt gedacht over het nut en noodzaak van het duurzaam bewaren van digitale bestanden, maar ook hoe weinig informatie er voor 'niet-professionals' beschikbaar is. De meeste van mijn gesprekspartners beginnen uit te leggen dat ze vroeger braaf CD's en DVD's branden maar dat ze inmiddels beter weten en zijn overgestapt naar opslag op een extra harde schijf. Meestal geautomatiseerd.
We leven in een digitaal tijdperk waarin een groot deel van de wereldbevolking werkt en communiceert met voortdurend nieuwere vormen van technologie. Informatie wordt uitgewisseld via e-mail, muziek bestaat alleen nog op MP3’tjes, vakantiefoto’s worden bewaard op internet en met de overheid communiceren we via een digitaal loket.
Q&A Piet Schreuders |
![]() Piet Schreuders (1951), graphic designer since 1975, editor-publisher of magazines De Poezenkrant and Furore, art director of VPRO Gids, researcher and writer. www.pietschreuders.com Images courtesy Piet Schreuders. All rights reserved ©Piet Schreuders. Was there an urgency to organize your archives? Yes -- things were piling up in my office, there was no more shelf space, piles of paper were spilling on the floor etc and this was obstructing my work. What is the structure behind its organization? Work archive; job files; spare copies of books and other printed matter I designed; special projects (books, films, etc.); photo negatives; correspondence files; miscellaneous papers; also press clippings and secondary literature (interviews etc), and personal papers. A special project, such as a book about Beatles locations, may require an entire filing cabinet full of paper files.
How do you keep track or how do you catalog the archives (print, computer)? Pre-computer: whenever a job came off the press I religiously put a copy into a carboard box. And whenever such a box was full I started a new one. So this is roughy a chronological collection (1968-1990). I have an (analog) list of all jobs. Computer: Whenever a job is done I copy the contents of the folder to a backup disc, year by year. There are between 30 and 60 of such job folders a year. I am currently compiling a (digital) catalog of all jobs, including the contents of each job file and related materials. I would welcome suggestions as to the organization of such a catalog. When did you start using the computer? 1990.
From that moment on, did you change storing your work files differently? If so, why? Obviously if a job is digital it has to be stored digitally. I went through several generations of storage media and currently use a 300GB harddisk plus 2TB backup disk. Additionally, each job usually has a (paper) folder with contact info, sketches, notes, hard copies; I save them as well, if relevant. In the early days I kept only the layout files but not the linked images because they required too much storage. I learned the hard way that it better to just keep everything. Do you regularly make back-ups? Yes, but not very frequently.
Do you use a strategy of saving your work files. If so could you briefly describe it? The work files are kept in a large folder on my computer called "Current jobs". When a job is finished, its folder is copied to an archive disk, then deleted from the work disk.
Do you have specific questions about sustainable storage of your digital work files? There are two storage problems everyone is familiar with: - The program with which the job was created is no longer supported or will not work under today's system software; - The fonts are missing; - The storage medium itself is corrupt. I lost a sizable amount of work from 1996 after storing it on cd-ROMS which proved inaccessible after only 5 years. I am sadly missing work files from 1997 which were stored on a 128Mb Magneto-Optical disk which no one can read anymore. I suppose the trick is to keep copying one's archive files onto new storage media as they become available.
How long would it take you to locate a five year old digital work file? And how long would it take you to locate a physical document? My digital archive from 1990 onwards is always online and accessible, so it is a matter of seconds.
Would you be able to use the digital file still? Whether it will actually work depends on the program (Quark? Illustrator? Indesign? Which fonts? Compatibility?) so it may take a long time to get the file in working order.
What is of more importance to you, your physical, analog archive or your digital archive and why? On a day-to-day basis, the digital archive is more important because I am often asked to re-submit artwork of old jobs which the printer has since lost (reprints of books, cd artwork, Little Golden Books, etc.). For serial publications, too, it is essential to be able to have quick access to earlier editions. In the long run, however, the analog archive may hold more relevance just because of its unique nature (sketches, rejected versions, original prints etc). If/when I ever issue a book of my own work I expect to rely heavily on the analog archive.
And the combination of the two is ideal -- for instance, I regularly scan archival documents and photos and publish them on Flickr and elsewhere on the net. I love this combination of digital and analog archive. I have a collection of photo negatives going back to 1964 (my own) and 1938 (my father's) and being able to digitize any image from this is fantastic, the best of both worlds. www.flickr.com/photos/pietschreuders/sets/
|